InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 8322
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/09/2012

Re: stockstuffer post# 42439

Sunday, 04/10/2016 7:25:33 PM

Sunday, April 10, 2016 7:25:33 PM

Post# of 235076
$SFOR case was dismissed. Like I said "read" the legal docs from Delaware. Just because they are licensing the Patents does not mean they "PROVED" $SFOR case against Microsoft / Phonefactor. As a matter a fact the original Judge in the case was speculative why SFOR waited until after MSFT acquisition of PF to file. They are simply licensing the patents like they are with the other "NO" name companies for practically nothing. Anyone can throw up APPS on google play or AAPL. They show ZERO downloads or reviews thus far, after months. "Their KEY ENCRYPTION only works in a browser environment." It's not a full time key encryption. Their are other companies that offer that.

How do you account for the massive shares being dumped into the huge volume and hype? Well, it has been said that was simply a last note holder that refused to sell to $SFOR. That has not been 8k'd. That has only been speculation posted no documentation. If you cant see the HUGE dilution going on here your blind.

Why would Kay go on stock promoting websites over the past 6 years to promote and pump $SFOR, just ask yourself that? Just read all the legal docs. Seems like a washing machine is going on here IMO. Trade on my friends JMO