InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,566.92
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
19,897.17
(
0.26%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.07
(
-0.17%
)
Brent Oil
85.51
(
-1.16%
)
Bitcoin
55,990.41
(
0.26%
)
Post# of 32393
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

SecurityScientist

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 43
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/09/2016

SecurityScientist

Re: HokieHead post# 18489

Sunday, 04/10/2016 2:31:58 PM

Sunday, April 10, 2016 2:31:58 PM

Post# of 32393
I disagree with your broad interpretation of the patent. Opening an attached device is pretty narrow. And it's the very limitation of the words used in the actual claim that are over arching when reading the patents claims to actual devices.

By the way, if it is as you say which I don't agree with, why hasn't Rx sued Apple over its use of biometrics on phones? The fact Rx hasn't says it all.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up