You sent a bunch of emails...which showed such misunderstanding of most all things it was amazing. And I'm not even sure as a "guest" member I can respond to them by email.
The one I would have used to respond isn't seen on the board for some reason - but here it is:
drugmanrx has replied to a post you made on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. on Investors Hub:
Isn't it funny that if a automaker make a car with bad brakes and they know it bad before they sold it.
And you purchased that auto from a dealer (a broker). You can still recoup your loses from that manufacturer without buying directly from them.
or say a generic drug company knowing sells a product that fall below the FDA guidelines.
and you purchase that drug from a pharmacy (a broker) you can still collect damages from that drug company without purchasing from them directly.
Double standards?
THE REPLY:
Yes double standards exist all over the place (heck, in some situations there is recourse for making bad decisions)...not here though.
You recover (and almost certainly only if the Court requires it) from the drug maker, the auto company....the stock fraudster.....NOT from the IRS, FDA, Auto Mauf Assos., etc.
(And to be clear....in the things you picked which are commonly personal use, non-income producing items...(in virtually all cases)....there would be NO TAX DEDUCTION of any type (certainly not under Sect 165), and to the degree there may be in some....it must meet a number of specific thresholds and qualifications.
He, you, everyone should certainly be pursuing recovery in the courts against the fraudsters.
The rest of your retorts are at least as wrong and just nonsense as this...
