lesn: That post had nothing to do with my post about Nate's 10 filing. It also had nothing to do with your claim that Nantworks is a subsidiary of Keyon. So, I am not tracking where you got any of that from.
I did not say there was a Nate's common share exchange like you are proposing would happen with Keyo. There was no such exchange. Nate's did not issue new shares. None of these claims happened. I didn't 'ask you.' I answered your questions. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121681916
Obviously, that can't happen in KEYO's case since the dissolution was filed years ago. Your steps would suggest the KEYO RTM is ruled out entirely.
In this wild RTM scheme, Nantworks would have to remain a subsidiary of Keyon or face $10s of millions in IRS penalties. Keyon, which has no management, would have to run Nantworks.
“It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us into trouble. It’s the things we know that just ain’t so.” Henry Wheeler Shaw
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.