InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 622
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/20/2015

Re: None

Sunday, 03/27/2016 11:41:58 AM

Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:41:58 AM

Post# of 232835
Question regarding possible revenue streams from Apple (I know, I know... read this in totality before knee-jerk replying):

It is a known fact that Apple owns perpetual licenses to use Liquidmetal without paying a dollar in royalties to Liquidmetal. However, Apple is not entitled to FREE manufacturing of Liquidmetal parts in perpetuity. The board has long argued that Liquidmetal is in no position to supply Apple with global scale manufacturing volume, and that Apple can manufacture in house without paying a penny more to Liquidmetal. However, Apple does NOT manufacture ANYthing in house, in order to maintain flexibility and focus on product DESIGN. WHAT IF... Eontec is establishing itself as Apple's go-to BMG manufacturing partner? Won't Eontec get all associated manufacturing revenues related to their exclusive territories while Liquidmetal gets all associated manufacturing revenues related to North America and Europe? Does it seem possible that Eontec could produce the BMG parts which would then be shipped to Foxconn (or elsewhere) for assembly into the final products?

Thanks for your thoughts and Happy Easter!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News