Yippy, Inc. (YIPI)

[ESP24]

PURE AND SIMPLE EXPOSURE OF THE FALSE AND MISLEADING

Let's run down the false and misleading information being perpetuated and with 100% verfiable information to once and for all to identify the truth and expose the fiction.

Premise: GSAT was GRANTED FOR FREE the 20% of YIPI just to agree to do business with YIPI. That is how bad things are over at YIPI such that YIPI has to give up 20% of the company, 10.7 million YIPI shares, just to sit at the table with another company...

236T568 Member Level Monday, 03/21/16 03:54:11 PM
Re: yipi kay yay post# 47368
Post # of 47430

actually, wrong again

Jay Monroe does not own 20% of YIPI

it is GSAT that owns 20% of YIPI

and GSAT was GRANTED FOR FREE the 20% of YIPI just to agree to do business with YIPI. That is how bad things are over at YIPI such that YIPI has to give up 20% of the company, 10.7 million YIPI shares, just to sit at the table with another company...

but hey,

not surprised

and why is it not surprising?

because this is what scam companies do!


Supporting Information: Outlining Specific Value Received for Issued Shares/Ownership of YIPI to GSAT

VERIFIABLE FACTs NEGATING CLAIM

ESP24 Thursday, 03/03/16 02:58:42 PM
Re: None
Post # of 47430
Revenue streams to YIPI through the GSAT agreement are being totally missed. The mentions about $3 monthly subscription fee/per user seems to be heavily focused on and touted as the bar for future revenue evaluation. There is exponentially more revenue streams outside $3 fee righted to Yippy in the agreement - GSAT-YIPI Agreement

If you are only accounting for $3 sub-fee to assess potential YIPI revenues and that excites you, then prepare to be screaming like a little girl after calculating all revenue streams granted to Yippy by right in the agreement.

I will rate upside potential 1-4
1 - small revenue upside potential
2 - mid-level revenue upside potential
3 - substantial revenue upside potential
4 - game changing revenue stream


•Right to resell all Globalstar equipment and services
1 - typical revenue through VAR channel

•Yippy may sale, lease or loan 3rd party equipment or directly manufacture 3rd party equipment in conjunction with GSAT Services
2 - Yippy has the right to create additional proprietary equipment for sale in conjunction with GSAT Services. Yippy can source and bundle existing 3rd party equipment.

Yippy development of User Terminal for sale to Yippy customers in conjunction with GSAT services. Globalstar will offer the Yippy Developed Equipment (YDE) offering to all current customers at the price identified by Yippy
4 - Yippy will undoubtedly create a User Terminal for it's customers (probably already started IMO). This additional offering from Yippy is price controlled and will automatically have GSAT as a channel partner marketing and promoting the YDE to a huge user base. $$$$$$

•Yippy able to sell insurance policies for GSAT equipment
1 - High margin line of business

and the one I don't think anyone has mentioned and is absolutely astonishing and by far going to be the biggest revenue stream is this;

GSAT provides Grant of Access to 20% of Colocation Space of GSAT Gateways with respect to Independent Gateways GSAT must use best efforts to obtain consent. The following verbiage in the agreement is very interesting as it is what follows as an applicable stipulation only to the recognition of Independent Gatesways "Yippy agrees that this Agreement shall not grant to Yippy any property or other rights in any of the Gateways or the Colocation Space. In the event, however that this Agreement is construed by a Globalstar Lessor to grant property rights to any of the Gateways, Globalstar agrees to use reasonable best efforts to obtain the consent of any such Globalstar Lessor to this Agreement, or upon request of Globalstar to immediately remove Yippy Boxes from the Gateway at Globalstar's cost. "
- 4 GAME CHANGER Let's break this down:

GSAT provides Grant of Access to 20% of Colocation Space of GSAT Gateways with respect to Independent Gateways GSAT must use best efforts to obtain consent.
[url]www.globalstar.com/en/ir/docs/GlobalStar_AR_2013.PDF
[/url][tag]Understanding Globalstars Ground Network[/tag]

Ground Network
Our satellites communicate with a network of 24 active gateways, each of which serves an area of approximately 700,000 to 1,000,000
square miles. The design of our orbital planes ensures that generally at least one satellite is visible from any point on the earth's surface
between 70° north latitude and 70° south latitude. A gateway must be within line-of-sight of a satellite and the satellite must be within line-ofsight
of the subscriber to provide services. We have positioned our gateways to cover most of the world's land and population. We own 12 of
these gateways and the rest are owned by IGOs. In addition, we have spare parts in storage, including antennas and gateway electronic
equipment, including two un-deployed stored gateways.

For recap, GSAT provides Grant of Access to 20% of Colocation Space of GSAT Gateways with respect to Independent Gateways GSAT must use best efforts to obtain consent.

The contract immediately gives Yippy 20% of all Colocation Gateways owned by GSAT and possibility of additional 20% Colocations Gateways owned by IOG. This means at this very moment Yippy has 10% allocation of GSAT ground network for TLPS with additional 10% allocation upside potential.

Think of this for a second, GSAT is allocating 20% total capacity infrastructure of all GSAT Colocation Gateways. At this percentage it would clearly appear GSAT's intention is to default bundle Yippy's platform into all services offered. Supporting this appearance would be the fact Globalstar will offer the Yippy Developed Equipment (YDE) offering to all current customers at the price identified by Yippy. The word "offering" at 1st appeared to mean as an option to their customers, but in context "offering" suggest that it would come as a standard offering with all GSAT services. Acquisition Positioning??

I could go on and on to connect the dots even more solidly
that would strengthen this position and end game intent. This seems like a good stopping point for the moment.

Watch How This Plays Out. Maybe as it unrolls I'll pick up with additional points.

Let's Have Fun. Keep A Tally as this plays out on the accuracy of the strategical assessment above.

Premise: GSAT was GRANTED FOR FREE the 20% of YIPI just to agree to do business with YIPI. That is how bad things are over at YIPI such that YIPI has to give up 20% of the company, 10.7 million YIPI shares, just to sit at the table with another company...


Premise: Magna sued Yippy and Little Richard and investment funds he was involved in. Having no real defense. Little RIchard made up counterclaims (as defendants backed into a corner do).

shajandr Thursday, 03/24/16 01:30:43 AM
Re: love your neighbor post# 47429
Post # of 47430

Yeah, well that's boolsheet. Magna sued Yippy and Little Richard and investment funds he was involved in. Having no real defense. Little RIchard made up counterclaims (as defendants backed into a corner do).

Then Little Richard got sued personally in a second, unrelated lawsuit by Sason and the Sason family for defaming their family name, disparaging their businesses, defaming the Sason et al. individuals personally, and stating that Little Richard poted that he would 'ruin the Sason family name'.


Little Richard is in the soup and deep. This ends in Granville's personal bankruptcy and likely YIPI's also.

VERIFIABLE FACTS NEGATING CLAIMS

ESP24 Tuesday, 12/29/15 11:28:40 AM
Re: bilked post# 45892
Post # of 47430

The initial suit brought against YIPI by Magna and the Sason's was a bluff and used as a scare tactic as they have used many times. Unfortunately, this foolish and amateurish strategy back-fired so royally solely based on the fact, John Snyder, a lawyer in a whole another league brilliantly immediately took advantage of Magna and lawyers colossal mistake. By immediately filing a counter-suit it automatically locked Magna in litigation without the option to dismiss the initial suit setting them up for mandatory discovery and evidence request. Accountability to produce internal Magna documents was something they never saw coming. Not mention the additional information outlined below really outlines how pathetically bleak the Sason's, Magna and Hanover Holdings chances are they walk away from this with a minimal 10 year sentence and 0.00 mummies

- Kahlon said he showed Sason how to trade like him in penny stocks and then cut off contact so that no one could accuse them of conspiring. - There are laws against doing this, but Kahlon thought he spotted an exception in Texas. He incorporated his company there, while operating from New York.
- Texas corporate records show Sason incorporated Magna Group in the state in 2010, using the same mail drop as Kahlon.
- In the summer of 2012, the SEC filed separate lawsuits against Kahlon and another penny-stock financier, saying their clever Texas loophole in fact wasn’t.
The SEC said Kahlon made $7.7 million buying penny stocks at deep discounts and dumping them on the public. Kahlon says he did nothing wrong; the case is still pending.

PLEASE LET SASON GET UP AND TELL THE JUDGE THAT MAIL DROP IS A COINCIDENCE. HAVE YIPI LAWYER PRESENT THE DETAILS OF THE MAGNA INVESTMENT SCHEME AND TIE IT SO NEATLY TOGETHER

KAHLON IS A SMALL FISH NOW AND SASON HAS DUG A HOLE WAY TO DEEP FOR HIS POOR LIL SOUL TO GET OUT OF.

IT IS CLEAR FOR ONE TO SEE THAT THE DEAL IS ON THE TABLE FOR KAHLON TO REALLY STICK IT TO SASON. GUARANTEED THAT KAHLON IS GOING TO TAKE THE DOUBLE WIN HERE IN THE FORM OF REDUCED OR DISMISSED CASE AND THE CHANCE TO GET BACK AT THE LOWLIFE SASON THAT LEFT HIM OUT TO HANG AFTER SHOWING HIM EVERYTHING HE KNOWS

JOSH "COPYCAT" SASON'S DAY ARE NUMBERED AND YIPPY TO THE MOON WITH A $50 MILLION CASH INJECTION AND HERO STATUS FOR CRASHING THE WHOLE SASON FAMILY NAME AND REPUTATION HAHAHAHAHA!






The author did not see how a twenty-seven-year-old could become so successful in investing in so short a time with traditional methods. He investigated and found a 2012 lawsuit in which a financier named Yossef Kahlon accused Sason of copying his business model and tracked him down. Kahlon said he showed Sason how to trade like him in penny stocks and then cut off contact so that no one could accuse them of conspiring.

Kahlon paid brokers to scour the market for penny stocks with high trading volume, then called the companies to see if they wanted to issue new stock.

These struggling companies can't sell new shares to the public the usual way, but they can sell to private investors such as Kahlon. They gave him steep discounts, and he'd sell the shares into the public market right away, often doubling his money as everyone else's shares were diluted. There are laws against doing this, but Kahlon thought he spotted an exception in Texas. He incorporated his company there, while operating from New York.
Texas corporate records show Sason incorporated Magna Group in the state in 2010, using the same mail drop as Kahlon.
In the summer of 2012, the SEC filed separate lawsuits against Kahlon and another penny-stock financier, saying their clever Texas loophole in fact wasn’t.
The SEC said Kahlon made $7.7 million buying penny stocks at deep discounts and dumping them on the public. Kahlon says he did nothing wrong; the case is still pending.