InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 369
Posts 10529
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2009

Re: Steve43 post# 73176

Monday, 03/14/2016 11:07:29 AM

Monday, March 14, 2016 11:07:29 AM

Post# of 331074
When the SEC gets involved its NOT about protecting those already in the stock. Its about protecting future shareholders from being victim to what they have found theyve done to current victims. You have to have victims first... in order to get involved and do something about it. Thats why HALTS happen in the first place. If they followed your logic there would be ZERO HALTS EVER. Since every HALTED stock has shareholders ALREADY in them. No HALT has ever happened to a stock that had NO SHAREHOLDERS. Pointless... HALTS are placed to protect investors from falling victim to practices they discover that are not on the up and up and needed Government intervention.

BIEL has hit the SEC radar for something they have been in the spotlight for before. The SEC made very clear to put that in the new indictment. That way when they HALT this ticker, they can say, well... there was a warning in the indictment. We pointed out this was not a new thing and therefore, many should have seen this coming.

Thinking they are walking away with multiple violations of the same broken laws is ludicrous. Thats not how the SEC works. Nor does it NOT HALT stocks in violation, due to some people already holding shares. Thats total bs and wishful thinking... NEVER in the history of HALTS have they taken the stance, its best in the public's interest to keep this one going, though we are aware of multiple, LEGAL INFRACTIONS.

One day many will wake up and this ticker will be HALTED and/or chilled while the case progresses.

BUYERS BEWARE!!! You dont want the attention of who they have attention from, and chance seeing all your money locked up and lost as a result.