InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 54
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2006

Re: brg88tx post# 11140

Tuesday, 07/18/2006 12:31:16 PM

Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:31:16 PM

Post# of 36793
A fair question, but alas I am afraid that my explanation of my investment and trading strategies would take quite a bit more time than i have to devote here today, and would most likely fall upon deaf ears and/or be a bit too complicated given the limited scope of the target audience. Suffice it to say my friend, that I NEVER believe everything i hear from ANY source, and i would counsel the neophyte investor to do the same, in addition, 60% is never an acceptable loss under any circumstances. A truly experienced trader utilizes protective stop-losses, if only mental, in ALL cases, NO exceptions, and would never bag-hold a position for what, years now is it?

I am sorry for your loss sir, i wish you better luck in the future, but again i find that you refuse to answer my very fair question which is: given your negative outlook on this company, why do you continue to hold?

And as well, I am very curious as to what anyone hopes to accomplish by this incessant public castigation of both the company and it's management, could the rumors of a large NSS position be true? Why so much posting from just a very few individuals? And why are the denials(with no proof to back them up), so vehement from people who represent themselves to be long-time shareholders?

Just my opinion for what it's worth gentlemen, I personally am cheered as to the future prospects of trading in some of the more heavily and currently illegally manipulated OTC stocks after Chairman Cox's recent statements, perhaps a day of reckoning is indeed almost here, I would assume the SEC will hold true to form and pick one or two situations to make examples out of, and being as it would almost certainly cause too much of a financial backlash to utilize a larger, listed stock, it would seem that a small BB or pink sheet stock would be an excellent candidate, as the monetary value of such judgement would not be enough to bankrupt any instituition, only a few selected guilty parties.

Crazy idea? Impossible? Yes, well, Martha Stewart thought the same thing several million dollars ago...

Cheers! Lego