"- and I respectfully and emphatically disagree with you. "
Are you saying you believe I am hyping this stock?
"- if they have been discussed at length, than it was only between the hysters who ignore important issues."
How do you know this? Have you read the posts?
"Statements that because an oil rig has not been struck yet as a claim that it will never happen is all hype and no reality."
These are people's opinions, if it's a positive opinion, does that make it hype just because you disagree with them.
"What is the point of your post? That because something has been discussed before, it cannot be discussed again? Is that what you are saying? I guess then you must disallow all posts until news comes out?"
The point is that, for some reason, I'm still trying to explain to you why your posts are not taken seriously. Why others don't eagerly read the links you provide to discuss the issues you bring forth. As I explained previously, I am tired of researching the long term impact on ERHE in re: to the search warrant. I stated that if you had any NEW information, I'd really being interested in seeing it. I may be wrong but my guess is that most feel this way on this topic.