InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 59
Posts 2267
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/13/2016

Re: Doktornolittle post# 54568

Sunday, 02/21/2016 8:03:24 AM

Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:03:24 AM

Post# of 724395

Impressive that you could throw together such charting, all labeled and noted, so quickly.



LOL.

I posted that 14 months ago in IV Post 1558 titled
SA Critique Part 1.

You should have a look at that Post.

You see, Pyr posted a very bullish analysis of NWBO on Seeking Alpha (linked above in the IHub header). People here on IHub went nuts with praise. Pyr was their lord and savior (ironic, considering that now he is the devil incarnate). No one offered any critical analysis. I figured, why not offer a critique.

That critique turned into a multipart analysis dragging on for months.

JMLogan soon appeared on IV questioning details of my critique. There was an open and respectful discussion.

Only a year later did I find out JMLogan was Pyr.

I am normally extremely critical of people using multiple aliases. While I don't condone what he did, I understand his rational; exploring the issues with Pyr would have been a very charged conversation. JMLogan entered the conversation with an open mind, and continued to explore the critique w/o calling me an A-hole for criticizing his work. I give him credit for that. And credit for seeking the truth rather than just defending his current view. It's important to have an open mind.

He was truly looking for someone to explore the merits of his conclusions rather than someone on IHub offering "atta boys".

I give him credit for continuing his dialog with me in an uncharged manner, especially since I was critiquing something he obviously spent a great deal of time preparing.

"Pyr" also briefly appeared on IV and the conversation was indeed "tense" between the two of us. So, that reinforces the notion that discussing the critique with JMLogan was more fruitful than with Pyr.

I'm not sure what ultimately changed his mind on NWBO but I think it was when I posted the German Label (have you seen it?) where the new enrollment details introduced a devastating affect on the assumptions he used in his calculations.

Anyway, I didn't prepare that chart yesterday, just linked to a 15 month old image I had included in Part 1 of my (multi-part) SA critique post.

(within that post 1558 I also included the excel formula for solving Shoenfelds equation; you might be interested in that if you are the "analytical" type)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News