MBA replies:
"Why don't start with some facts and answer the questions! The attacks are on your bogus claim of some great terrorist jeaprody of offshore oil wells along the coast of West Africa. "
- Read the link. They are not my claims, they are those of the news. And they are legitimate.
"Just how many terrorist attacks have been made on any of the oil wells offshore the coast of West Africa? The answer is NONE"
- I don't know, that is what I asked in one of my posts. But the article is not about past attacks, it is about potential attacks by a proven threat which has stated their intent to do damage to that region.
"Plus, it's a joke for a small row boat to head out 100 miles into the ocean to attempt such stupid idea of thinking they will harm an oil rig such as the DWD"
- I didn't say they would do it in a rowboat. But I do think a small boat is most likely, because it is easiest to avoid radar and being seen. And don't tell me 100 miles is too far, it is not. Did you know that people have crossed the Atlantic in a beach catamaran? That people have crossed the Atlantic in a boat less than 8 feet long? That a jet ski is untrackable by radar in even slightly large seas?
"It is far to say that most folks think you are a nuisance more than a legitimate source of information and DD, however, you do bring a certain sense of sick humor to the board klngfargone"
- Further support that people want to ignore the facts and reality of this region and the potential problems that it has. You read the articles and make your own opinions, that is fine, but there is no need to shoot the messenger. And also, thanks for the compliment?
