Reading elsewhere, there are some interesting trends developing, IMO, involving wonder about the leaders who assisted the followers so ably in separating shareholders from their money again and again, all the while telling them the good times were just ahead.
First, there is the acknowledgement elsewhere there may have been "wolves among the sheep" passing themselves off as fellow suffering sheep.
Now, ex post facto, Solms is being excoriated as unfit, incompetent and possibly morally challenged, given his positive statements about turnaround, profitability, big deals so close they could smell them, hundreds [or dozens--he said both] of pilots that are sure to turn into deals with revenue.
Ironic isn't it? At the time, Solms enjoyed almost unbroken support from the devout followers until the very end--except from the critics posting where criticism was allowed [here].
The wolves among sheep discussion is the one I find most interesting.
Long after the fact, there is public wonderment of how they were led astray again and again by the same people.
This is one thread I hope they pursue, and may finally disgorge the masked ones who acted as one of them with only their best interests at heart, who somehow was always pointing the wrong way, always interpreting bad signs as good signs, always directing the discussions away from criticism and any negativity, even when the facts justified questions about events and actions.
Wave has always had a thug component. Now, those who were fleeced get to look at fellow 'fleecee' complainants for the first time with questions they were never permitted to ask.
A most fruitful field of endeavor, in my opinion. Make a game of it--call it The Great Wave Game. Spot the thug with the faux sheep-skin, pointing the wrong way.
Blue
