InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 122
Posts 6384
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2014

Re: Doc logic post# 54234

Wednesday, 02/17/2016 12:24:16 PM

Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:24:16 PM

Post# of 704219
I provided a study that was done that found long term use of TMZ (> 6 cycles) statistically significant to long-term survival.

http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2014.9.FOCUS14502?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed

But, that doesn't mean I'm not acknowledging UCLA's theory that DCVax-L potentially changes the patients DNA to make them more susceptible to TMZ. Perhaps patients in the past who were not responsive to TMZ suddenly become responsive to TMZ. Data has been shared on this iHub regarding that phenomenon. I can smile and agree with you that TMZ is a low-hanging fruit. I truly believe there is a synergy with TMZ+Vaccine, and I hope this study is able to statistical prove that. However, I also recognize there was no control arm in the earlier studies, and had there been a placebo group that was able to deviate from Stupp protocol, they too may have seen a high OS given the inclusion criteria the study was privy to. If one is being objective, they recognize the burden of proof is not anywhere near a slam dunk for DCVax-L. Boom or bust, my bet is on DCVax-L and that it extends OS.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News