"Adam",
I see your journalistic prowess has taken a back seat to your enthusiasm.
Quote:
That's the most damning evidence against NWBO. If the company's technology was credible, there'd be a long list of investors owning the stock. Instead, there's just Neil Woodford, and even he's now come to the realization that NWBO was a mistake.
That first sentence belonged at the end of the previous paragraph. By the way, why did you use Steven's verbatim response to me on Seeking Alpha when answering another poster's question here on ihub around the time you first showed up on this board? Kind of interesting to me how the 2 of you seem so much alike at times with your responses here and you don't even say your response was a quote from Steven. Isn't that plagerism?
Now as to the points you presume to make in the quote above, what PROOF do you have that Neil Woodford has stated publicly or privately that his investment in NWBO was "a mistake"? The share price drop during regulatory review of data that keeps the company quiet is not proof of anything so don't try to use that as proof. Mr Woodford has said that it is too early to pass judgment on the company so unless you can show me where he has said differently you are putting words in his mouth that he has not spoken. Where is that journalistic integrity you sought to invoke upon yourself?
That long list of actively managed institutional investors that you are talking about is waiting for regulator validation to put the price over $5 and keep it there but then you already knew that or should have right?
One more tidbit for you to think about. Synergy is music to the ears of scientists and FDA is listening to a symphony.
