InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 547
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/13/2010

Re: TopFemaleExec-2014 post# 2467

Sunday, 02/14/2016 12:47:28 PM

Sunday, February 14, 2016 12:47:28 PM

Post# of 39913
Much info here, and obviously much frustration and disappointment for you. I'll go through it, to see if I can become more aware of the misunderstandings that created the problems.

It's not likely I can do anything to help, but I think I can speak for most Max Sound investors (but not speak for MAXD management) that they would like to see the problems resolved, and in doing so provide financial rewards to both Constance Nash and Max Sound Inc; not one over the other.

It won't be easy, but there must be a way to make the best of a bad situation. What has transpired up to now is done; what happens from here is what matters most. Make the best of what happens from here. I don't know what that is, but I would think it could start with confirming the financial compensation agreement (your share of any settlement) from making Google accountable for their theft. That compensation for you should remain (from a legal perspective), regardless of the current Contempt of Court issue.

Preventing both Constance Nash and Max Sound from any settlement income from Google only benefits Google.

Pursuing a dispute of the agreement with MAXD having been unlawfully modified, if such did indeed happen, is likely best done after all parties receive compensation from Google. The sad truth is that it takes a lot of money to seek justice or satisfaction in the courts. If you prevent yourself from receiving income from a settlement, you may never be able to dispute the activities you believe were improperly conducted by Max Sound.