InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 4460
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/20/2015

Re: Adam_Feuerstein post# 53342

Thursday, 02/11/2016 7:44:11 AM

Thursday, February 11, 2016 7:44:11 AM

Post# of 702545
You claim:

The FDA did not require a crossover in the DCVax-L study. I know, Liau claims otherwise. She's mistaken. No, I'm not calling her a liar. She's just mistaken. FDA has long emphasized OS as the gold standard endpoint in the front-line setting for just about all cancer indications. I can't think of an example right now where OS is not the required endpoint in a front line cancer setting. IF you can provide me with an example, I'm happy to reconsider. PFS and even ORR are approval-worthy endpoints in more advanced lines of therapy, but not front line.



In Dr. Liau's video (2 and a half minutes of the exact verbatim quote from her video below) she doesn't sound at all uncertain or as if she is guessing and I agree she is not a liar. "The FDA actually required" sounds pretty certain and not just the slip of the tongue. It is an important premise supporting the other information she shares with us. If you are not calling her a liar then prove you allegation (or retract it). Where are your proof points? Did you call the FDA and have them confirm your allegation? That sounds like a bona fide question about trial design and not necessarily something that would required to be blinded. You haven't hesitated to do things like that in the past. If so lets hear the details. If you have no proof to point to I would stick with believing Dr. Liau. She doesn't seem like a person who would mislead others and not a person who would make a statement like that unless she was certain.

19:03
We restarted the trial again in 2010 as a phase-2. Got some good initial data and went on to currently a phase-3 trial. This time its blinded, randomized and controlled. So now we are making vaccine for everybody ahhh and that was a way to retain the patients on the trial. The caveat here, then though so now the blinded trial, is comparing these are all newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients and patients either get standard treatment plus vaccine or standard treatment alone and plus placebo. We actually give them just PVMCs as placebo, but the issue is because we have vaccine made for everyone and we are kind of doing a somewhat invasive procedure on these patients the FDA actually required us to have a cross over arm so we have a crossover arm when patients progress. So interestingly the whole cohort actually has not yet reached I guess its yes predetermined event, umm ay yay how would you say it the predetermined number of events and it seems like everyone is living longer than we would have been expecting so in reality I think what we are really comparing now is early DC vaccination vs later DC vaccination and and I guess it is a good thing patients are living longer but it is not really helping our study because if the patents didn't get anything hopefully the differences would be bigger . . .
20:40

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News