The digital media part of the business has the most potential, BUT, the divestiture of Co-signer is still in the works, though I don't have the exact details on that. Focus is on getting the the 10-Qs out, though who knows if any surprises come in the meantime. What I wouldn't give to speed up time for this part of my life and get to the final result, good or bad.
I also said this a while back - whether this is a "SCAM" or incompetence / poor execution or bad luck or anything else in between hardly matters with regards to the end result - we either lose or we don't (or something in between depending on how you traded). The difference with "SCAM" is that we get very ANGRY at people involved and want to do terrible things to them (and understandably so), while with the other scenarios we might not get nearly as upset and might even walk away thinking we had a good shot and everybody tried their best in good faith and it just didn't work out. In EITHER case we always have to ask ourselves what better due diligence could we have done. In this case, if you re-read the press releases, the web site, etc., it would be easy to conclude that this was going to be successful. Contrarily, if you paid attention to the huge debt and potential conversions and the timing of them, then you would have stayed away (which I did not, humungo mistake on my part, not my strength in interpreting that data and the timing of it). Finally, if one chose to believe the lies about the largest controlling investor that have been repeatedly posted here as well, then one would likely never invested in XCLK regardless of what other positive news XCLK was putting out there.
My original post to which you are replying to already expresses my opinion on the SCAM aspect.
