InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 179
Posts 35399
Boards Moderated 19
Alias Born 04/17/2013

Re: janice shell post# 102654

Monday, 01/25/2016 3:42:37 PM

Monday, January 25, 2016 3:42:37 PM

Post# of 221266
Welp, I mentioned this was a course of action open to the US Atty.

See in RED.

shajandr
Thursday, 01/21/16 03:09:52 PM
Re: penknee post# 4766
Post # of 4874

I am not aware of any mandatory legal authority that requires Shkreli to request the court grant him leave to travel to DC to testify.

Cummings letter simply states that "it is his responsibility to take reasonable steps to comply".

Really? Then have the executive branch, through the US Attorney in the pending criminal case make the motion to the court to allow Shkreli to travel to DC. Shkreli can oppose the motion if he wishes - he can offer a variety of assertions in opposition.

For example, he can state that travel to DC to appear at a highly partisan adversarial hearing in which he believes he would be humiliated - resulting in uncontrollable mental distress that he believes may cause him to violate provisions of his bail - such as an emotion-induced action to flee the country or go underground and avoid appearing for his NY trial. This is an extreme example, butt it would put the court in an odd position of granting leave to travel in the face of opposition from the defendant.

I'm nott aware of any statutory or caselaw authority requiring Shkreli to affirmatively request a leave to travel. Perhaps there is such caselaw - I'm nott a criminal lawyer, so maybe there is such authority. If so, it's odd that Cummings didn't cite that in his letter.

I suppose we'll find ~OUTT in the next week or so.

I'd absolutely stick to my Fifth Amendment protections - especially if it is an open hearing. Offers of immunity be damned. The Congress cannot grant immunity from state court actions - so there is that aspect of testimony which can be relevant to state court prosecution(s) that CONgress cannot grant immunity for.

Further, there is a serious Constitutional question about Congressional grants of immunity in general, even as to Federal prosecution - to say nothing of tainting the juror pool by such appearance in Congress.

http://volokh.com/posts/1177539284.shtml



http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119993231

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.