Thursday, January 21, 2016 4:06:58 AM
As far as accusing (directly or by implication) someone of intentionally 'fuzzying up' a document, which is still readable, is itself a rather bizarre assertion.
What would be the motive for making a document harder for read (optically), butt still entirely readable? It would nott accomplish any goal of concealing the content, butt would instead simply generate readers' doubts about the scanner's functionality or the competence of the person operating the scanner. In your mind (according to your post), you deem this an impeachment of credibility. Bizarre!
'Tis such an odd complaint offered to bolster an absurd claim of 'doctoring' or selectively obscuring documents to imply a CONspiracy of deception.
It's nott like somebody intentionally deleted over 33,000 emails that were already subject to a pre-existing Federal (Congressional) investigation and several FOIA requests as well. Or, well, "to wipe it like with a towel or something."
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM