InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 127
Posts 3172
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2015

Re: PacificNW post# 49892

Thursday, 01/07/2016 11:12:42 AM

Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:12:42 AM

Post# of 708087
I'm not saying things didn't go sour. But when you look at how that came about it was like a piling on of sorts; I believe they may not have planned to tell us about the screening halt because it had to do with something positive that someone (AF, for example) would have spun to the negative. Someone found the "Temporary Halt" on the European clinical trial site (It wasn't and still isn't on the US site) and it blew up because NWBO had no idea that would happen. The rest is history, the piling on ensued and the pps dropped like a rock.

I believe NWBO had a big financing lined up which would have propelled the price the other way without having to say anything about what was cooking in the screening halt. Instead it went the other way and staying mum was better than making excuses. I don't believe Linda Powers deliberately let the price drop but I believe she's remained silent as it occurred because she believes she has something to say soon that will make it all worthwhile for those who stayed in. Why wouldn't Woodford have been dumping his shares all along if he didn't have some knowledge of her strategy? Even with his move to get his man on the board that failed he's still here. Why? I believe most in the know understand NWBO's going through a tremendous hurt right now but the volume of shares being traded shows most are still watching and waiting it out because what they've seen of the science and see it's promise, no matter how critical anyone is about how that data has been collected and shown or what they think of Linda Powers' management style.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News