InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 14217
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/27/2014

Re: mattsinvestmentclub post# 7594

Wednesday, 01/06/2016 6:36:09 AM

Wednesday, January 06, 2016 6:36:09 AM

Post# of 37543
Peterbelt - There's a reason why VitaStik already failed domestically and internationally. It's not that a good a product. It was a fad that has already passed.

You say it's a wonderful non-nicotine alternative to NOT smoking or vaping nicotine based juices. A "healthy" choice. First of all, everyone knows that vaping vitamins is a hoax and that there are not health benefits whatsoever because the amount of vitamins absorbed into the body is insignificant.

If it's such a great healthy choice, why didn't it sell?

Social media consultants want you to think it's because MCIG/VTCQ "didn't try" selling it here in the good ol USA. They only tried selling internationally. You know it failed domestically because it didn't sell the first go around.

Wake up. It FAILED domestically AND Paul/VTCQ guaranteed international failure by agreeing to a very, very bad contract with international distributors. That contract is still in effect, no? No announcement that it's been successfully changed, correct? Prolly locked in for 3-5 years, buddy. If it wasn't a bad contract to begin with, why would Paul/VTCQ find a need to "renegotiate"? LOL

One can increase revenues by selling both thc based AND nicotine based products because there's actual demand for those products.

Again, the only way VitaStik is going to sell is if it's part of a smoking cessation program. You incorporate nicotine based juices AND vitaStiks - AS A SMOKING CESSATION program. We're not talking rocket science here.

It wasn't long ago that Paul said he wanted nothing to do with the $35 BILLION dollar USA tobacco industry.

Social media consultants said nicotine based juices will be ready early January 2016. Where is it?

Where is the renegotiated contract?

Where is the thc based juices?

And despite what Social media consultants are trying to tell everyone, companies are actually MORE valuable when you sell MORE, not less.

Do you really think VTCQ is worth more if it sells less? No, I didn't think so. And I'm pretty sure that noone instructed VTCQ to stop operations or sales. The lack of revenues was due to a bad product, bad management, bad sales model. Those supposed 90+ salesman aren't very good at sales, are they? One wonders if they actually have 90+ salesmen