No I have never and will never provide any names on my posts without permission of the source. They are from within and outside the company. I may communicate some of that privately with those whom I have come to trust. My sources are as reliable as it gets. Feel free to review my posting history here and on other boards, I certainly would not make up that level of detail and do not expect my sources to do so as well.
Feel free to post that this is a scam while providing your source, even if generally speaking, of that information as well, we'd all be interested. Lack of company communication could certainly be construed as such, but the company has been advised to limit its communication while it finishes filing the 10-Qs, and we can either respect that, or reject it, it's up to each individual to make that determination. If what I said is actually true, just if, then this stock has a fighting chance.
Calling it a scam or communicating other negative thoughts will have zero impact on this stock longer term. At this point, at this price, it really doesn't need retail investor interest. When it finishes its filings, and shows revenues, and starts to clear its debt, then the price of the stock will have no choice but to go up, regardless of anyone's posts on this board, including my own.
As always, time will tell, and as indicated in my post, that "time" is not that (relatively compared to last April) far off.
