Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[Evintos]

Rule 2002 is mailing or notifying all parties on a list of every filing the parties (defendant or plaintiff) has filed. The new filing is to remove people no longer involved or no longer requires notification (past counsel, settled parties, etc.) No need for employee A to be notified of Kareem's shenanigans. A motion to remove parties on 2002 list should be done pretty much every time a claim gets settled or disallowed.

I touched on this on post 439644 and was ridiculed for suggesting that there are some on the list that doesn't need to receive any further bankruptcy filings. *COUGH* SUSMAN MILKING ESTATE FOR RECEIVING FILINGS ON CASES HE'S NOT INVOLVED IN *COUGH* Susman's firm isn't the only one that doesn't need to be on that list either. The firm is just one of the few that actually charges for reading/receiving and "processing" (by processing they probably just shred it and throw it in the trash) the filings.

On top of that, Susman is neither counsel nor co-counsel to any WMILT litigation or claims proceedings remaining. The much hated WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP is. What's Susman Godfrey LLP doing? Not a thing besides charging for services and expenses for receiving faxes, mail and emails about WMILT activity and answering escrow holder questions. What they should do is file a "Request for Removal from Service List". The firm is milking the LT.

----------------------

The other filing is scheduling Omnibus hearings. Standard procedure. Many of the Omnibus hearings (post-2012) have either be rescheduled or cancelled. So the scheduled dates aren't important.