InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,399.22
(
-0.51%
)
US TECH 100
18,362.80
(
-0.93%
)
Dow Jones
39,935.07
(
0.20%
)
Brent Oil
81.67
(
0.16%
)
Bitcoin
66,931.59
(
1.74%
)
Post# of 222469
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

shajandr

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 177
Posts 35551
Boards Moderated 19
Alias Born 04/17/2013

shajandr

Re: janice shell post# 100892

Friday, 12/18/2015 8:55:37 PM

Friday, December 18, 2015 8:55:37 PM

Post# of 222469
Wickard v. Filburn is 1942. And the court's rejection of many New Deal programs as unconstitutional is what (as you know) drove FDR's court-packing plan - which changed how they ruled (albeit without passing).

Wickard relates to a New Deal program.

Many/most New Deal cases did nott reach the court for final adjudication by the Supremes until after 1937.

Hence the SC was dealing with New Deal and follow-on issues well into the '40s and even to a degree into the '50s.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up