(Edited): Yes...thanks for your help.
I believe financials have interfered with PO's being issued necessitating the restructuring which may continue today (e.g consolidating office locations/other?). I also believe DB may have been set for a lower scope procurement around the time of the May $5.1m funding, one for which their internal procedures did not require a tender or if they did came and passed with Wave getting the nod. They then expanded the scope presumably from VSC only, adding SEDs and Bitlocker requiring the tender, or another one assuming the first required one. No, I don't know if they are a prime or sub, but are they a sub it seems their financials could also be subject to the scrutiny by the prime (not just the customer), but just guessing on that.