Coretec Group Inc (CRTG)

[k741]

How can they justify getting funding for the next generation when the current version does not work when the PI on both is the same person?

A degree from the university does not grant them special privileges for the use of facilities or IP.

The appearance of a single individual as the PI for two similar projects for different employers is suspect - especially when one employer belongs to his wife and he is a principal. Did TDCP get true value for its payments.

There is evidence of unpaid use of university facilities by TDCP. Somebody needs to be on top of the unreimbursed use of facilities and conflicts of interest for this and similar projects.

The IP appears to belong to TDCP as long as it exists. The SRA does not seem to have an escape clause to permit the university to revoke the use by TDCP.

Remember too that the university has an ownership interest in TDCP.