InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1462
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/20/2012

Re: flipper44 post# 46459

Saturday, 12/05/2015 1:47:26 PM

Saturday, December 05, 2015 1:47:26 PM

Post# of 716489
That's a reasonable way to look at it. But if that's the case, I don't know why Linda would even include the "plus about a month" comment when she did. Just leave the expected timeline of "end of Summer 2016" that had been previously stated and make adjustments to the timeline down the road if/when screening is required to resume. Not making the comment makes more sense to me under your scenario, especially since she has been so committed to err on the side of silence.

I've also considered the possibility that the one month comment is more applicable to a worst case scenario where the pipeline patients were insufficient to reach full enrollment. Such as if a higher % than expected failed the final criteria to begin treatment. Thus it really represents the amount of time that would be necessary to recruit/enroll a few more to reach the 348 (based on enrollment pace at the time of the screening suspension).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News