InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 834
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2014

Re: austinmediainc post# 46220

Tuesday, 12/01/2015 10:29:25 PM

Tuesday, December 01, 2015 10:29:25 PM

Post# of 704531
Austin your posts assume malfeasance by LP because she owns both companies, and because you assume that, you assume that it's bad. If it turns out to be true malfeasance then you are correct. But for a moment suspend your "assumptions" and recognize that it is possible that there is no malfeasance by LP and the contracts are equal market rates or better? Then in that case we are very lucky to have cognate. Also just because a member of management happens to own a vender does not preclude the company from using the vender. This will be one of the issues that Leary investigates. If upon investigation it is determined that there is nothing detrimental to shareholders big and small by the contracts then will you acknowledge that we are lucky to have cognate? For example if it is determined that LP has been siphoning off funds for the sole benefit of cognate and herself (and again, that will be reviewed by Leary) I would acknowledge that your point of view is correct. Until then you are assuming because you have no proof, only conjecture.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News