Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[poopscooper]

Selling short requires them to eventually cover to make money? Covering is buying back shares, is it not? Why would they want to buy back Paychest shares? What would trigger them to do so?


Yes they would have to buy back to lock in a profit or a lose.
Usually shorters short high and buy back lower
in this case clowns would have everyone beleive that shorters shorted this at 0001 and are looking to buy back lower for a profit or not buyback at at
when pyct goes BK...
pyct has put out countless NRs(50+) in the last 8years that show they alive, well and moving forward getting plenty buying 0001 pigeons in the meanwhile.
This is what dumpers need.
They have done a memorable job in 8 years...PRO? or plenty pigeons?




I'm under the impression that a threat to raise the SP would signal a good reason to cover. LOL To buy back shares before the SP rises.


Yes,that rule applies to all shorters on Wallstreet
Usually any kind of good positive forward looking news will trigger some buying from both investors and shorters....in pyct case
clowns will have readers believe that shorters are responsible for pyct stuck at 0001 for 8years...not countless 0001 shares always avaiable always on sale.
someone dumping?