InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: 10nisman post# 11286

Sunday, 11/08/2015 8:34:53 PM

Sunday, November 08, 2015 8:34:53 PM

Post# of 29294
Re: WY-PCL merger

First of all, as a longstanding PCL shareholder who has a low average cost, I’m relieved that this deal is fully non-taxable.

As an almost “pure” timberlands play, PCL is unique among publicly-traded companies. However, the post-merger WY will be a very strong timberlands play insofar as timberlands will produce 50% or more of overall sales, assuming a sale or spin-off the cellulose fiber business (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/weyerhaeuser-explore-strategic-alternatives-cellulose-200200755.html ). Thus, I’m comfortable with the prospect of owning WY stock on a long-term basis.

The merger’s exchange ratio—1.6 shares of WY for each share of PCL—equates to a nominal premium of 21% based on Friday’s closing prices of the two stocks. Although a 21% premium is somewhat lower than I might have expected for such a well-run company as PCL, the 21% premium in a fully non-taxable deal is roughly equivalent for me to a 40% premium in a taxable deal, so I really can’t complain.

Moreover, WYE intends to maintain its $1.24/sh annual dividend, so the new dividend per PCL share will be $1.24x1.6 = $1.984—a 13% boost relative to PCL’s current payout of $1.76 (and a yield of 4.9% relative to PCL’s closing price on Friday).

All told, I’m pretty happy with the deal terms and I plan to vote my PCL shares in favor of the merger.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.