InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 177
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/13/2014

Re: Quantum Sound post# 1512

Thursday, 11/05/2015 6:12:38 PM

Thursday, November 05, 2015 6:12:38 PM

Post# of 39913
Yeah....
on another note,that 17 page dismissal brief from Google was incredulous!!
It had MAXD running complete rough shot over both Vedante and VSL.
No one in their right mind would have ever stood a chance at attempting what Google said MAXD did. Small Excerpt from brief here.

"Vedanti consistently and repeatedly has maintained, and continues to
maintain, that neither it nor VSL has granted any rights to Max Sound to sue
on Vedanti’s U.S. patent.
The agreement cited by Max Sound is between VSL and Max Sound. Vedanti
is not a party to it. As for Max Sound’s claim that VSL was acting as
Vedanti’s agent, there was no such conduct or intent.
In connection with the making of the agreement between VSL and Max
Sound, Max Sound sought rights to sue on Vedanti’s U.S. patent. Those
requests were rejected. On about June 12, 2014, after the VSL-Max Sound
agreement was made, Chris Joe speaking to a VSL representative
acknowledged, before numerous witnesses, that the “marching orders” to the
lawyers were that there would be no patent infringement lawsuit.
Subsequently, in July and early August 2014, Max Sound renewed its requests
for permission to file suit on the U.S. patent. The desire and need for such
permission is evidenced, inter alia, by the documents Max Sound prepared
and submitted to Vedanti in order for Vedanti to grant that permission.
Vedanti refused. The absence of Vedanti’s signature on the documents
evidences Vedanti’s refusal."

SO THIS CLAIMS THAT NEITHER VEDANTE NOR VSL GAVE RIGHTS TO SUE!IT SOUNDS LIKE VEDANTE MAY HAVE EVEN REMOVED THEIR SIGNATURE FROM THE
PATENT INFRINGEMENT APPROVAL!

MORE REASONS TO SUE BOTH VEDANTE AND VSL FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT...A 3 for 1 !!!