InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1374
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2005

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/28/2015 12:01:12 PM

Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:01:12 PM

Post# of 733276
For those that have responded to my examiner posts, I will add some color so you better understand where I am coming from.

The bottom line is the examiners report has more weight then you guys think and here is why. NO ONE IS DISPUTING THE FINDINGS AND EVERYTHING THE EXAMINER SAID IS COMING TRUE SINCE 2012.

3 YEARS HENCE:

1. Examiner said money will not flow to p's or q's. Guess what, no money has flowed.

2. Examiner said any lawsuit would be frivolous. Guess what, no lawsuit filed.

3. Per footnote: Examiner did not do an analysis on the WMB loan portfolio, let me say it again, WMB. What does that mean, in the eyes of the examiner and in the probable eyes of fdick-r and in the probable eyes of susman, and in the probable eyes of any judge, THERE ARE NO WMI, IE, HOLDING COMPANY MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO ASSETS. So it becomes jpm's word against escrows, ie, UNLESS A LAWSUIT IF FILED ESCROWS DON'T HAVE A PRAYER.

4. Next up is where are the holding company assets should there be any. Examiner said there were none, and guess what, none have shown up, They are gone, jpm took them and sliced, diced, laundered, stole, washed, gave away, and the biggest one, COMMINGLED so they can't be traced back to the holding company. NOT LAWSUIT, NO WAY TO PROVE THEY WERE HOLDING COMPANY ASSETS.

Let me add some color: So, when fdick-r tells jpm, lol, to return assets, jpm will say fu, there are none, prove us wrong, wamu was so fd up that all the books are worthless, in our eyes, all the assets were banking assets and here is why. JPM can even refer to the examiners report. AGAIN, NO LAWSUIT, NO PROOF THAT JPM IS NOT RIGHT and politically fdick-r has cover with the examiners report.

The indicator that the theft was complete was the jpm pr, 30 billion in the wamu rubble. That gave jpm confidence that they commingled all the commercial paper well enough to fight off any lawsuit. Many of you thought the commercial paper had to be holding company assets, hmmm.

I know it's not fair but right does not make might in the world of high stakes banking fraud. WHAT MAKES RIGHT IS A LAWSUIT FILED ON BEHALF OF ESCROWS. PROVE FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE AGAINST FDICK-R AND JPM AND ESCROWS HAVE A CHANCE, NO LAWSUIT, NO CHANCE.

all imo
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News