InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 4448
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/17/2008

Re: None

Friday, 10/16/2015 10:13:59 PM

Friday, October 16, 2015 10:13:59 PM

Post# of 41703
When Ad Hoc attorney(s) were shown the DIP financing sealed plans for POR, knowing that this $95 million loan was less than they could have received, that all value of GTAT was conservatively appraised, furnace sales, deals in the works such as 'warree', and others, the Lender felt confident that GTAT would come out and repay that loan.

So why could the Ad Hoc attorney not use the companies OWN assessment on valuation for argument for equity ? Clearly the Lender was not concerned of that GTAT would not honor their loan terms, and it wouldn't seem possible that that it would take four years before they stated making a profit.

Something stinks here big time, and that's JMO.


-bunny-
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.