A major advantage of muni wifi is much greater capacity and much lower latency...
The biggest case "for" is one of capacity... It's a matter of trivial mathematics that sharing spectrum over a small geographic area versus over a far larger cell site results in a much larger capacity per user. This is because that same spectrum can be re-used over and over. The result is that Wi-Fi can deliver some two orders of magnitude greater bits per second per square meter than cellular data networks. Simply consider a one-kilometer radius cell site versus a 100-meter radius Wi-Fi access point, and that's a hundred-to-one difference in coverage area.
Because of the simpler CSMA protocols and smaller networks, Wi-Fi also has inherently lower latency, less than 10 msec, whereas 3G networks are struggling to get down to 100 msec. As a result, Wi-Fi provides a better broadband experience and scales better for dense user configurations. Another pro is the prevalence of Wi-Fi-equipped computers, whether notebooks or handhelds. The architecture of mesh makes a lot of sense, too, namely that only a subset of access points need a connection to a wireline infrastructure. With standardization coming through IEEE 802.11s, we'll eventually have interoperable mesh infrastructure. And with VoIP becoming a reality for Wi-Fi, even voice service becomes a possibility.http://www.smallbizpipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=175007733
This should all translate into better service at lower cost. Then there's WiMax that will improve the range of muni wireless dramatically.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.