InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 6432
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2014

Re: None

Thursday, 10/08/2015 10:35:31 AM

Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:35:31 AM

Post# of 86313
Well, now that the REVERSE is out on the table

Quote from poster Winters AKA Brian Conway:

-Meeting with LG on Tuesday to discuss options with the PPS (can a R/S be done in a way to protect long shareholders? IDK).



Considering the number of posts defending the company as having said "NO" to a R/S, this gets buried 5 lines down on a post from the poster claiming to be Brian Conway?

I'll save everyone the effort. Anti-dilution clauses can be contractual in nature--but "THEY CANNOT CREATE ANOTHER CLASS OF STOCKHOLDER" So good luck with that task.

Now if you go back and read my recent post regarding a reverse, it is not so much the reverse--which SHOULD affect everyone equally--it is what happens AFTER the reverse that creates the dilution.

And that is exactly where this is heading.

Once that happens, shareholder meetings and the like will be meaningless--if that is not already the case.

JMHO, and as always, GLTA!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.