InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1735
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2014

Re: notbrad post# 42237

Friday, 10/02/2015 11:58:44 AM

Friday, October 02, 2015 11:58:44 AM

Post# of 704289
Thanks for making my point. There are no clues, and you said there were. So which is it, they are definitely legally liable for what is PR'd, I don't question that. The fact is that they have traditionally alluded to things in the past when it is advantageous to them. They didn't here except keeping to the definition of the halt. If the trial screening halt is not for a negative reason, would they be liable for stating that? Where are the clue you alluded to initially?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News