InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 2587
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2015

Re: janice shell post# 346479

Monday, 09/28/2015 3:29:11 PM

Monday, September 28, 2015 3:29:11 PM

Post# of 358425
I agree but if COR held onto the shares Calissio would have had paid them.
COR, Beaufort, Nobilis should have known about the 25% rule Calissio has nothing to do with when they sold their shares.

But wouldnt the 4 million be given to COR, Beaufort, Nobilis from Calissio only to be returned to Calissio or is it since Calissio did not have an account with DTCC in essence the DTCC just borrowed money from COR, Beaufort, Nobilis expecting Calissio to pay them back?

Either way I do not see Calissio being at fault here. It is either DTCC or COR, Beaufort, Nobilis. Calissio did not write the 25% rule.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.