Question: if in 4 years it is apparent that substantive work has happened on new drugs would this lessen your disapproval substantially?
And in the more FWIW category, I think he really will spend money on development. Within family of other biotechs with revenue. He was in Retrophin, for instance.
Sure, why wouldn't I?
But has he ever spent money on R&D in a meaningful manner?
Have any of his prior companies ever completed a meaningful clinical trial? Published any papers? Developed a next-generation compound for a disease of choice?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.