GT Advanced Technologies Inc fka GTAT

[MattySR]

Just because they have shareholders best interest in mind does not mean they are qualified to lead the EC. Not once have we seen a resume of any sort from either of the people Bunny listed. (except Williams)

Even on the current Ad Hoc, the only suited players would be Wilingham and maybe Southard (due to his legal experience.) William's would be great for the EC but he is not on the Ad Hoc, apparently he has been contacted though.

What do Xena / Larry / Cents do or have experience of to be on the official equity committee that will lead Shareholders to having our rightful recovery? That is something not many people know on IHUB unless Xena, Larry, or Cents told people in PM to various users. Maybe Bunny knows something I don't? Because it has never been made public on the board.

I, and many other shareholders I bet, invite anyone qualified to reach out to the UST with their reasoning on why they should be on the EC if they feel so fit.