InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 60
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/21/2015

Re: Fizzman post# 259844

Monday, 09/21/2015 7:58:19 AM

Monday, September 21, 2015 7:58:19 AM

Post# of 347753
Fizzman I honestly believe Vanis when he says the reverse split was to satisfy our corporate and financial partners. If it was only about selling more shares, all MINE would have to do is increase the AS by another billion or so. Management knows that a reverse split is super unpopular, but in the long run it will help. Legit financial institutions don't want to touch a stock that has 3.5 billion shares. But 35 million is extremely attractive.

I agree that being a shareholder might make Vitamin Fizz taste better, but I promise you I tried each drink with 0 bias. It's not even fair how much better Fizz tastes. Fruit Water and Sparkling Ice are our biggest competition and even those drinks taste lousy. The best way I can put it is Vitamin Fizz is a pleasure to drink while the other brands are a chore. That difference is possibly the biggest reason I'm invested and I believe it will pay off in time.

I think the percentage we get of revenue is very reasonable. Did us shareholders create the drink? Are we doing any of the hard work it takes to distribute it? Heck no! We are just the lucky ones who get to invest in this wonderful product. I think it's fair.