InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1124
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2014

Re: Dan88 post# 41106

Friday, 09/18/2015 11:38:29 PM

Friday, September 18, 2015 11:38:29 PM

Post# of 711785
This is the Flipper argument and it is not consistent with the facts. The PR stated the issue had to do with questions about enrollment "criteria" -- remember sniffles etc. It do not say there was simply a temporary hold. First, if there were a temporary hold because they were reviewing data for AA, the PR would not have been so specific regarding the reason. Further, FDA would be reviewing a massive amount of docs on every aspect of the study. So, why point to patient characteristics as the reason. Makes no sense as I told Flipper. The simplest explanations are:

1. The DMC noted irregularities in the application of recruitment criteria at one or more sites. This triggered an alert to FDA and a hold pending review. Or,

2. The was an adverse event that triggered a review of enrollment criteria.

I will not be posting for a while, so that it will be easy to find this post when I have to remind you that I was correct.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News