InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 131
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/18/2015

Re: janice shell post# 34729

Saturday, 09/12/2015 6:38:57 PM

Saturday, September 12, 2015 6:38:57 PM

Post# of 54903
It is all in intrepatation I guess.

I say that the regular quarterly dividend they offered was by legal definition a "special" one but they choose not to and were within their rights to call it a regular quarterly one. Question being if they were required to label it as such when all the meant to do was let shareholders know it was 1 of 4 for the year.

The other one being a "one-off" one was called special for that reason. Legal term or not. That was because it was a 1 time only.

That is the trouble here is we are not lawyers and therfore have not enough tools to get to the bottom of the issue. All we can do is have fun in the search for the truth. And above all we are not the judges in this case either :)

I am just appalled that if this case is the same players as the SRGE fraud that some heads need to roll in the FINRA/SEC office.