![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, September 12, 2015 6:38:57 PM
I say that the regular quarterly dividend they offered was by legal definition a "special" one but they choose not to and were within their rights to call it a regular quarterly one. Question being if they were required to label it as such when all the meant to do was let shareholders know it was 1 of 4 for the year.
The other one being a "one-off" one was called special for that reason. Legal term or not. That was because it was a 1 time only.
That is the trouble here is we are not lawyers and therfore have not enough tools to get to the bottom of the issue. All we can do is have fun in the search for the truth. And above all we are not the judges in this case either :)
I am just appalled that if this case is the same players as the SRGE fraud that some heads need to roll in the FINRA/SEC office.
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM