InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 627
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2012

Re: Hugodrax post# 13123

Thursday, 09/10/2015 3:49:09 PM

Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:49:09 PM

Post# of 15276
Well, I think your answer where you go back to first Shazam announcement while there is clear second one shows exactly how deceptive your postings are.

Nowhere in the first announcement it was mentioned that there would be revenue, if there is revenue it is mentioned..as on the second one.

Now you changed your wording from no revenue to maybe not free but Steve said minimal...deceptive...right.

If it would be a monster contract then it would be a announcement material art...correct!!


And fore sure it is more a strategic contract then a highly commercial contract.

And on the same way you discredit the new ad announcement.

If there is a announcement with revenue in early 16 I am fine.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DSNY News