InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1743
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/16/2015

Re: jaros post# 7514

Thursday, 09/10/2015 9:56:06 AM

Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:56:06 AM

Post# of 20102
Ok, so like I said previously, while the 464 Patent may have some value, the scope within which this card is being used ("on board biometrics and battery powered") completely infringes upon another companies Patent. You can't hide behind a product that is only "partially" covered by a Patent or Patent Application. If they take the biometrics off the card, then there won't be any issues. However, I think there may be a huge issue once this card hits the market. Thats al I am saying. I am convinced that SMME has no IP regarding its use of biometrics, especially the way they claim it will be used. They may have developed their on sensor, their own algorithm, their own power source, but the way the card uses biometrics, it completely violates another patent owned by another company. Just saying.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SMME News