InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 2880
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2014

Re: janice shell post# 32669

Wednesday, 09/09/2015 1:08:13 PM

Wednesday, September 09, 2015 1:08:13 PM

Post# of 54940
correct, and that glitch may mean that he as well was caught off guard by the 25% rule as well as I mentioned.

He also might be referring to only shares bought back directly by CRGP shouldn't qualify for a divy, hard to tell by the language/wording. As that might be unjustly enriching them seeing as the buyback was in place to retire the shares.

Glad we got some movement in this story