InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2968
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2014

Re: None

Saturday, 08/29/2015 10:08:33 PM

Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:08:33 PM

Post# of 123645
I think so Mis. And I'm going to stick to this transaction and call out MRIB and Margrit. There are so many questionable things that have happened but this is one event that needs explaining and without explanation and/or divulgence of the recipient it most likely represents a crime by her. A felony as a matter of fact. I'm going to go out on a limb and risk Margrit suing me but I am going to say that she benefitted financially through a felonious action. If not? Explain it. Someone did. Given that the 504 exception could only be transacted through Margrit as confirmed in the latest report as a more than 50% vote, she had to be party to the transaction. And giving someone a minimum of $240K for a five day holding period on a non-risk based maximum of $65,000 is a fixed deal. There is a crime here anyway you cut it.