InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.20
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,548.40
(
0.39%
)
Post# of 62039
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

WhiteFish

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 85
Posts 15066
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/31/2013

WhiteFish

Re: stervc post# 35014

Saturday, 08/29/2015 9:22:42 PM

Saturday, August 29, 2015 9:22:42 PM

Post# of 62039
All good info, but you left out why the BK was dismissed. Creditors filed a motion to dismiss claiming the case was a SARE. The court agreed. The court had no opinion on whether a plan was viable or not, nor did they approve any plans before dismissal. The creditors did this so that SIRGQ could not use further delay tactics in the BK and so they could pursue collection efforts faster. Thoughts or rebuttal?

WhiteFish Style

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up