Followers | 2571 |
Posts | 307824 |
Boards Moderated | 29 |
Alias Born | 04/12/2001 |
Friday, August 28, 2015 1:24:07 PM
As I said in my last post, I don't know what the rule is about issuances made after the record date but before the ex date.
A different question has been raised on another board: If CRGP paid the dividend on those shares, but got it back because it owned the shares, how did it profit? The transaction would be a wash.
CRGP had no way of knowing who sold them the shares they bought or that the owner was dumping hundreds of millions of them on the market.
According to the complaint, they did know from whom they were buying. Nobilis converted debt to common shares, and sold them to CRGP, or to affiliates of the company who then sold them to CRGP.
The only reason CRGP raised the A/S was because they needed the shares for the conversion of that note to the tune of almost 400 million shares.
And why would that cause them to raise the a/s from just under one billion shares a month ago to 3.475 billion today? That suggests there were other large issuances. COR wouldn't know about them; it would only know what was going on with its own clients.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM