InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 885
Posts 51475
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/26/2007

Re: NicoleMarie post# 27053

Friday, 08/28/2015 11:39:00 AM

Friday, August 28, 2015 11:39:00 AM

Post# of 54911
That is not at all what that suit implies. It is not asking shareholders to give back divy. Omg. I am utterly shocked by how few people on these boards can read with understanding and comprehension. You will not have to gove back your divy. It was declared by the company and paid. Thatbis a done deal. The dispute now rests between COR and crgp as to who was respinsible for paying it on the excess shares that have come into the market since 6/30.