InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
87.33
(
0.48%
)
Bitcoin
58,429.95
(
-2.88%
)
Post# of 222175
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

coinsguy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 28
Posts 711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2005

coinsguy

Re: janice shell post# 94120

Monday, 08/24/2015 9:19:38 PM

Monday, August 24, 2015 9:19:38 PM

Post# of 222175
Yes Janice, I realize that is what the document states but it is a mathematical impossibility if the A/S on June 30, 2015 was 129,460,000, as was stated in the Quarterly report, and the owner had 102 million.

102/129 = 0.7906976744186047 or 79%. So either the A/S reported is wrong, the number of shares the owner had is wrong, or the percentage they reported is wrong. Take your pick sweetie.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up